Skip to content
ZAKHORIUM

Method

How the atlas knows what it knows

Zakhorium’s basic unit is the statement: a sentence that paraphrases a precise passage of a source. Events, profiles, museum items and quiz questions are assembled from these statements, so every sentence displayed carries its own source marker.

Each statement has two independent axes. The kind of evidence says what sort of knowledge it represents; the verification status says whether the reference has been checked. A tradition can be perfectly verified as a tradition.

When scholars disagree, the disagreement is recorded as a debate, with positions attributed to those who hold them and the source’s assessment kept separate. The atlas does not pick winners where the source does not.

The reference book is used as a historiographical foundation, not as a reservoir of text: nothing is transcribed beyond titles and the recommended bibliography, and none of the book’s illustrations is reproduced. The Portuguese paraphrase is the reference version; the English is a translation of it.

  • Documented evidenceAttested by contemporary evidence: texts, inscriptions, coins, papyri or archaeology.
  • Scholarly reconstructionHistorians' inference from indirect evidence.
  • Tradition or narrativeA literary, traditional or religious account; significant in itself, but not independently verified.
  • Contested interpretationScholars explicitly disagree; see the positions in the debate.
  • Illustrative reconstructionA hypothesis or visual scheme to guide reading; not a historical claim.

§ 01Status

What works, what is partial, what is missing