Skip to content
ZAKHORIUM
PTEN

Local laws in the empire's interest

Date

522BCE

522–486 BCE

Darius I allowed the Temple to be finished and evidently had local laws written down, a policy that may have helped raise the Torah to communal law.

Political historyReligious history31.7772°N 35.2350°E
550 BCE
500 BCE
450 BCE
400 BCE
350 BCE
Becoming the People of the Book: each bar is an event of the period; this one is in coral.

Sourced narrative

Each block is a verifiable statement. The number opens the cited page; amber or coral blocks flag tradition or contested interpretation.

7 statements

01From Cambyses to Darius

Cyrus's son Cambyses conquered Egypt, which gave Persia a bigger interest in the territory connecting Egypt with the rest of the empire, Yehud included. He died before reaching home, and his successor, Darius I (522 to 486 BCE), consolidated the empire: he reorganized administration, expanded roads and started a waterway linking the Red Sea to the Mediterranean. Darius's permission to finish the Temple, begun under Cyrus but halted under Cambyses, may have been part of that effort: a way of binding Yehud more closely to Persian rule by sponsoring Jerusalem and its temple.

02Codifying local laws

02

To hold the empire together, Darius I evidently sought to codify the local laws of his subject communities. A document from Egypt suggests he told his satrap to assemble a panel of Egyptian wise men who would write down all of Egypt's ancient laws, whether civil, priestly or private.

04

Tradition or narrative

A comparable effort may lie behind the book of Ezra, in which the Persian Empire does more than acknowledge God's law: it lends its own authority, ordering that the ignorant be instructed and granting Ezra the power to penalize offenders.

05

The Persians may have encouraged this development, since they cared how the communities they ruled were run. In the Bible's account, Ezra and Nehemiah were charged by the Persian king himself with governing Judah by the law of God, and there may be some truth in that.

03An image of the king

The book illustrates the chapter with a relief sculpture of King Darius the Great (figure 2.2).

Context

Map 2.1 of the book shows the empire of the Persian Achaemenid dynasty (539 to 332 BCE), with Babylon, Judah/Yehud with Jerusalem, Egypt with Elephantine and the capitals Susa, Persepolis and Ecbatana.

§ 01Geography

Where it happened

Gazetteer coordinates (Pleiades for ancient places; Natural Earth and Wikidata for modern ones) over modern physical geography (Natural Earth). Coastlines and the Dead Sea have changed since antiquity.
▮ loading geography

§ 02Museum

Objects and images

Each item states whether it is an ancient object, a modern photograph or a later artistic interpretation.

§ 03Historiography

What scholars debate

Positions shown side by side, unranked, as the source reports them. The source’s own assessment appears separately.

Scholarly debate · 01

Did Persia shape the Torah's authority?

2 positions · no single answer · take a seat →

  1. A

    Persian government encouragement

    A hypothesis the authors find plausible

    The Torah would have taken root among the people of Judah in Persian times as a charter of religion and social life, perhaps with government encouragement; Persia may have enlisted officials such as Ezra, or the Hananiah of the letter, to instruct people in it and apply it as a regional code.

  2. B

    Israelite legacy, not Persian invention

    The authors' own caveat

    The authors do not suggest that Persian rule created the Five Books or that they were canonized to serve Persian interests: they were part of the cultural legacy inherited from Israel.

The source’s assessmentThe authors note that the gap between the Elephantine papyri and Hecataeus cannot be filled in detail, but that the Torah seems to have taken root in the Persian period.

§ 04Network

Connections

§ 05Bibliography

Further reading

  • Pierre Briant, From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1998).

    History of the Persian Empire (authoritative scholarly work) · recommended in Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 60

§ 06Apparatus

Sources on this page

  1. 01Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 37; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 519inspect
  2. 02Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 49inspect
  3. 03Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 37; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 519inspect
  4. 04Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 49inspect
  5. 05Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 49inspect
  6. 06Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 39inspect
  7. 07Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 35inspect
  • Documented evidenceAttested by contemporary evidence: texts, inscriptions, coins, papyri or archaeology.
  • Scholarly reconstructionHistorians' inference from indirect evidence.
  • Tradition or narrativeA literary, traditional or religious account; significant in itself, but not independently verified.
  • Contested interpretationScholars explicitly disagree; see the positions in the debate.
  • Illustrative reconstructionA hypothesis or visual scheme to guide reading; not a historical claim.