Skip to content
ZAKHORIUM

Statement

Josephus clears Titus: the fire supposedly came from a soldier, without orders and against the general's wishes. For some scholars this is another of Josephus's attempts to shield his imperial patrons; Titus, they hold, gave the order to burn the Temple.
Contested interpretationLow certainty✓ Verified

References

  1. p. 98

    reports disagreement · main text · ch. 4

    Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman. The Jews: A History. 3rd edition. New York and Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.

    Verification anchor recorded · checked against the page text

  2. p. 99

    reports disagreement · main text · ch. 4

    Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman. The Jews: A History. 3rd edition. New York and Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.

    Verification anchor recorded · checked against the page text

Scholarly debate

Did Titus order the burning of the Temple in 70 CE?

2 positions · no single answer · take a seat →

  1. A

    Against Titus's will

    Flavius Josephus

    The Temple was destroyed against Titus's will, when a fire began with a lone soldier's unauthorized act; Titus had even hesitated to destroy an 'ornament' of the empire.

  2. B

    Titus's order

    Some scholars

    Josephus, who sought the imperial family's favor after switching sides, would have been making excuses for Titus; in fact the general ordered the burning.

The source’s assessmentThe authors do not settle the question and stress that, whatever the cause, the loss of the Temple left a deep mark on Jewish memory. They also note that Josephus's account is openly pro-Flavian.