A sect that rejected the Oral Torah
Date
754CE
c. 754 CE to tenth centuryapproximate date
The Karaites rejected the authority of the Mishnah and Talmud and sought to derive law from the Bible alone; they formed communities in Jerusalem and Egypt but remained a minority beside the rabbinic majority.
Sourced narrative
Each block is a verifiable statement. The number opens the cited page; amber or coral blocks flag tradition or contested interpretation.
6 statements
01Doctrine and practice
Karaites made up many of the Jews working at the Fatimid court. The name comes from the Hebrew root qara', 'to read': the Karaites rejected the authority of the Mishnah and Talmud and held that law must be derived through critical interpretation of the biblical text, without the mediation of an 'oral tradition'. The Karaites differed from the rabbis on concrete matters: they read the biblical ban on kindling fire on the Sabbath as also forbidding letting a fire lit beforehand burn; they rejected the nonliteral reading that bars mixing meat and milk, and were therefore called 'eaters of meat with milk'; and they criticized the second festival day rabbinic Jews keep outside the Land of Israel.
02Origins
Karaism is generally said to have arisen in the eighth century, and by the 10th century its adherents were tracing their origins to the scholar Anan ben David. Historians today think, however, that the followers of Anan and the Karaites were initially different groups with different ideas, merged only later in the Karaite imagination.
03Communities and limits
By the 10th century Karaite communities were well established across the Middle East, with their own synagogues, especially in Egypt and Palestine. Stressing the duty to dwell in the Holy Land, they formed a significant part of Jerusalem's Jewish population. After the Crusades many moved to the Byzantine Empire and some as far as Poland and Lithuania, led by Tobias ben Moses, credited with translating Karaite texts from Arabic into Hebrew.
Despite the success of the relocation, the Karaites drew comparatively few followers: according to Benjamin of Tudela in the twelfth century, only 500 lived in Constantinople. The great majority of medieval Jews kept to the rabbinic tradition, which weathered the challenge, though in the tenth century Karaite scholars contributed significantly to Hebrew philology, philosophy and biblical exegesis.
Despite the polemics, rabbinic Jews and Karaites did not live in sealed-off communities: the Cairo Genizah shows frequent mixed marriages in Egypt, with contracts settling how to reconcile the couple's practices. Karaite elites helped the Gaon of the Jerusalem yeshivah obtain appointment from the Fatimid caliph, and the Geonim of Sura and Pumbedita used Karaite merchants such as the Tustari family to dispatch responsa to Egypt and North Africa.
§ 01Geography
Where it happened
§ 03Historiography
What scholars debate
Scholarly debate · 01
Do the Karaites descend from Anan ben David's movement?
2 positions · no single answer · take a seat →
- A
Anan as founder of Karaism
Karaite tradition itself from the tenth century on
By the tenth century Karaites had begun to trace their origin to the eighth-century scholar Anan ben David.
- B
Two originally separate groups
Present-day historians, according to the authors
The followers of Anan and the Karaites would have been groups with different ideas, merged only later in the Karaite imagination.
§ 04Network
Connections
§ 05Bibliography
Further reading
Marina Rustow, Heresy and the Politics of Community: The Jews of the Fatimid Caliphate (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008).
The Fatimid period and Karaism · recommended in Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 182
Leon Nemoy, Karaite Anthology (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1952).
Anthology of Karaite authors · recommended in Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 182
§ 06Apparatus
Sources on this page
- 01Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164inspect
- 02Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164inspect
- 03Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164inspect
- 04Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 521inspect
- 05Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164inspect
- 06Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 164; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 165inspect
- Documented evidenceAttested by contemporary evidence: texts, inscriptions, coins, papyri or archaeology.
- Scholarly reconstructionHistorians' inference from indirect evidence.
- Tradition or narrativeA literary, traditional or religious account; significant in itself, but not independently verified.
- Contested interpretationScholars explicitly disagree; see the positions in the debate.
- Illustrative reconstructionA hypothesis or visual scheme to guide reading; not a historical claim.